Alcey (Elsie) PERKINS
HAIRSTON.org ID#798, b. 1766, d. 1814
Father* | Peter PERKINS1 b. Jun 1739, d. 1813 |
Mother* | Agnes WILSON d. bt 1801 - 1813 |
Birth* | Alcey (Elsie) PERKINS was born in 1766.2,1 |
She was the daughter of Peter PERKINS and Agnes WILSON.1 | |
Marriage* | Alcey (Elsie) PERKINS married Peter HAIRSTON, son of Capt. Robert HAIRSTON and Ruth STOVALL, in 1782.2,1 |
Residence* | Alcey (Elsie) PERKINS lived on 11 April 1786 in Upper Saura Town, Stokes, North Carolina.1 |
Census 1790 | Peter HAIRSTON was New Tag Males <16 1, 16+ 3, Females 3 , slaves 58. on 2 August 1790 in Stokes County, North Carolina.3 ![]() |
Census 1800 | Alcey (Elsie) PERKINS listed in the household of Peter HAIRSTON on 4 August 1800 in Salisbury, Stokes County, North Carolina; Males 26-44 1, Females 10-15 1 , 26-44 1, slaves 103.4 ![]() |
Census 1810 | Alcey (Elsie) PERKINS listed in the household of Peter HAIRSTON on 6 August 1810 in Sauratown District, Stokes County, North Carolina; Males 45+ 1, Females 45+ 1, slaves 130.5 ![]() |
Death* | Alcey (Elsie) PERKINS died in 1814.2 |
Burial* | She was buried in Stokes County, North Carolina.6 |
Family | Peter HAIRSTON b. 24 Feb 1752, d. 1 Dec 1832 |
Child |
|
Charts | Descendant Chart Descendant Chart Box |
Sources (www.HAIRSTON.org)
- [S24] Hall, Wm. Kearney 1918-. Descendants of Nicholas Perkins of Virginia. 1957 Ann Arbor, Michigan.
https://hdl.handle.net/2027/wu.89069618338, Hathi Trust Digital Library. - [S22] Hairston, Elizabeth Seawell, The Hairstons and the Penns and Their Relations, Roanoke, Virginia 1940 https://search.ancestry.com/search/db.aspx?dbid=13164, Ancestry.com.
- [S1790] 1790 Federal Census - National Archives and Records Administration - Ancestry.com and FamilySearch.org.
- [S1800] 1800 Federal Census - National Archives and Records Administration - Ancestry.com and FamilySearch.org.
- [S1810] 1810 Federal Census - National Archives and Records Administration - Ancestry.com and FamilySearch.org.
- [S48] Find A Grave Website with Photo - only listings with photos of grave markers that are contemporary to the deceased individuals death are acceptable for genealogical proof.
Last Edited | 27 Jan 2022 |